CS Executive · Jurisprudence, Interpretation and General Laws · Constitution of India
An Ordinance is promulgated by the President while Parliament is not in session. Parliament reassembles on 1 July. Neither House passes a resolution disapproving the Ordinance, and no Act replaces it. Assuming Parliament's reassembly date is the only relevant date, when does the Ordinance cease to operate?
The Ordinance ceases to operate six weeks after Parliament reassembles on 1 July, since no disapproval resolution was passed. Article 123 gives an Ordinance life until that expiry unless both Houses disapprove earlier or the President withdraws it before then.
- AOn 1 July, immediately on reassembly
- BSix weeks after 1 July, i.e. on expiry of that periodCorrect
- CSix months after promulgation
- DOn 1 July only if the President withdraws it
Explanation
Under Article 123, an Ordinance ceases to operate at the expiry of six weeks from the reassembly of Parliament, or earlier if both Houses pass resolutions disapproving it. Here no disapproval occurred, so it runs for six weeks from 1 July. Option A confuses reassembly with lapse. Option C applies to Proclamation-type timings, not Ordinances.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Constitution of India shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Constitution of India questions
- A Bill passed by the Lok Sabha is sent to the Rajya Sabha, which wants to reject it entirely. The Bill is a Money Bill. What is the position…
- A tribunal decides a dispute while clearly exceeding the jurisdiction given to it by statute. Aggrieved, the company approaches the High Cou…
- Which of the following is correct about the Council of Ministers of the Union under Article 75?
- Under the Constitution of India, a Proclamation of National Emergency under Article 352 can be issued by the President on which ground?
- Which of the following Fundamental Rights is available only to citizens of India and not to foreigners?
- Which statement about the Preamble as an aid to interpretation is correct?