CS Professional · Drafting, Pleadings and Appearances · Adjudications and Appeals under SEBI Laws
Meera Depository Participants Ltd has filed an appeal before SAT against an order of an adjudicating officer made under the Depositories Act, 1996. The appeal was received on 1 April. What is the statutory expectation regarding its disposal?
SAT should deal with the appeal as expeditiously as possible and endeavour to dispose of it finally within six months from the date it receives the appeal. Section 23A(6) of the Depositories Act sets this as an endeavour, not a rule that the order lapses.
- ASAT must dispose of it within 30 days, failing which the order is set aside
- BSAT should deal with it as expeditiously as possible and endeavour to dispose of it finally within six months from receipt of the appealCorrect
- CSAT has no time expectation for disposal
- DSAT must dispose of it within one year from the order appealed against
Explanation
Section 23A(6) of the Depositories Act says the appeal shall be dealt with as expeditiously as possible and SAT shall endeavour to dispose of it finally within six months from the date of receipt of the appeal. This is a directory endeavour, not a deemed-allowance rule. Hence the six months run from 1 April, not from the date of the order.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Adjudications and Appeals under SEBI Laws shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Adjudications and Appeals under SEBI Laws questions
- A two-member Bench of SAT hears an appeal filed by Anand Textiles Ltd. The two members differ in opinion on a point of law. What is the proc…
- Kaveri Brokers' appeal against a SAT order was due before the Supreme Court on 1 May, but the managing partner was hospitalised in a critica…
- Meridian Securities Ltd, a Mumbai broker, receives a copy of a SAT order against it on 10 March. It wishes to appeal to the Supreme Court un…
- Arvind Textiles Ltd is penalised by SEBI. It also faces action under another statute for the same conduct and argues that the SEBI Act displ…
- SAT dismisses an appeal by Arvind Textiles Ltd. against a SEBI penalty order. Arvind wishes to appeal to the Supreme Court arguing that SAT …
- SAT hears an appeal by Orbit Brokers Ltd against an adjudicating officer's penalty order under the SEBI Act and, after hearing both sides, w…