CMA Final · Direct Tax Laws and International Taxation · Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements (DTAA)
Meera, resident in India, has a total income of Rs 10,00,000 on which Indian income-tax after reliefs under the Act is Rs 2,00,000. It includes foreign income of Rs 4,00,000 from a country with no section 159 agreement. That country assessed total income of Rs 5,00,000 and tax actually paid there, before double-tax relief, was Rs 1,25,000. What deduction is allowed under section 160?
The deduction is Rs 80,000. The Indian rate is 20% and the foreign rate is 25%; the lower rate of 20% applies to the doubly taxed income of Rs 4,00,000, giving Rs 80,000.
- ARs 1,00,000
- BRs 80,000Correct
- CRs 1,25,000
- DRs 1,60,000
Explanation
Indian rate = 2,00,000/10,00,000 = 20%. Foreign rate = 1,25,000/5,00,000 = 25%. The lower is 20%, applied on the doubly taxed income of 4,00,000 gives Rs 80,000. Rs 1,00,000 wrongly uses the 25% foreign rate, and Rs 1,25,000 is the whole foreign tax.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements (DTAA) shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements (DTAA) questions
- Under the Income-tax Act, 2025, when a term used in a DTAA is not defined in the agreement but is defined in the Act, which meaning applies?
- Mr. Arvind, a non-resident, wants to claim relief under a DTAA entered into by India. Under the Income-tax Act, 2025, which condition must h…
- Under the Income-tax Act, 2025, an assessee who is not a resident in India wants to claim relief under a tax treaty notified under section 1…
- Which statement about section 159 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 is correct?
- A treaty uses the term 'royalty' but does not define it. The term is also not defined in the Act or any notification under section 159(7)(b)…
- Under section 159 of the Income-tax Act, 2025, a term used in a treaty is not defined in the treaty but is defined in the Act. What meaning …