CS Professional · Arbitration, Mediation and Conciliation · Challenge to Award and Appeals
Meridian Steels Ltd and Kaveri Infra Pvt Ltd have an arbitration agreement that says nothing about how an arbitrator may be challenged. On 3 March, Meridian learns that the sole arbitrator was constituted. On 10 March, it wants to challenge him. To whom, and in what form, should it send its challenge under the default procedure?
Under the default procedure the challenging party must send a written statement of the reasons for the challenge to the arbitral tribunal within fifteen days of becoming aware of the tribunal's constitution or of the circumstances giving rise to the challenge. It is not made to the Court or orally.
- AA written statement of reasons to the arbitral tribunal within fifteen days of becoming aware of its constitutionCorrect
- BAn oral request at the first hearing, to the other party
- CA written application directly to the Court within thirty days
- DA written statement of reasons to the opposing party within sixty days
Explanation
Where the parties have not agreed a challenge procedure, a party intending to challenge must, within fifteen days of becoming aware of the tribunal's constitution or of the circumstances in section 12(3), send a written statement of reasons to the arbitral tribunal. The tribunal, not the Court or the other party, is the recipient at this stage. Options naming the Court, an oral request or a 60-day window do not match the default procedure.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Challenge to Award and Appeals shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Challenge to Award and Appeals questions
- Sunrise Textiles Ltd, Surat, applied to a court in India to enforce a foreign award against Kaveri Exports Pvt Ltd. The court refused enforc…
- Harbour Logistics challenged an arbitrator, and the tribunal rejected the challenge. The tribunal made an award against Harbour, and the Cou…
- Mehta Infra Ltd challenges arbitrator Mr Rao under the default procedure in Section 13(2). Mr Rao does not withdraw, and the opposing party,…
- In an arbitration between Kavya Textiles and Nair Exports, the sole arbitrator has not issued any procedural order for many months without e…
- Mehta Infra Ltd and Sundaram Builders referred a dispute to a sole arbitrator, Mr. Rao. After hearings began, Mr. Rao suffered a serious ill…
- Delta Pharma Ltd's challenge to arbitrator Ms Iyer under Section 13 is rejected by the tribunal. Delta wants to stop the proceedings and go …