CA Intermediate · Advanced Accounting · AS 18 Related Party Disclosures
Meru Ltd is a subsidiary of Himal Ltd. During 2025-26, Meru sold goods of Rs 80 lakh to Himal, and Himal sold goods of Rs 50 lakh to Meru. Meru also gave Himal a loan of Rs 20 lakh, outstanding at year end. Meru's total sales were Rs 5 crore. In Meru's separate financial statements under AS 18, which disclosure is correct?
Meru should disclose sales of Rs 80 lakh, purchases of Rs 50 lakh and the Rs 20 lakh loan balance separately, with the relationship. AS 18 requires volume by type and outstanding balances without netting, and elimination arises only in consolidation.
- ADisclose only net sales of Rs 30 lakh because AS 18 requires netting
- BDisclose sales of Rs 80 lakh, purchases of Rs 50 lakh and the Rs 20 lakh loan balance separately, with the nature of the relationshipCorrect
- CDisclose only transactions above 10% of total sales, so only the Rs 80 lakh sales
- DDisclose nothing, since transactions between holding and subsidiary are eliminated in separate statements
Explanation
AS 18 requires disclosure of the volume of each type of transaction and outstanding balances, along with the relationship. Items of a similar nature may be aggregated but different types are not netted; sales, purchases and loans are different types. Elimination applies only in consolidated statements, and AS 18 sets no 10% threshold.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on AS 18 Related Party Disclosures shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More AS 18 Related Party Disclosures questions
- Which of the following is NOT deemed a related party relationship merely by virtue of the stated relationship under AS 18?
- Tara Engineering Ltd and its subsidiary Tara Castings Ltd are being reported. Tara Engineering sold goods costing ₹30 lakh to Tara Castings …
- Sagar Ltd. holds 60% of Tarang Ltd. and 25% of Uday Ltd. Tarang holds 15% of Vihar Ltd. and Uday holds 40% of Vihar Ltd. Vihar and Tarang tr…
- Bhima Steels Ltd had these dealings with its associate, Cauvery Alloys Ltd, during the year: sold goods ₹80 lakh; purchased goods ₹30 lakh; …
- Rao Engineering Ltd has the following in the year: it sold goods of Rs 12,00,000 to its holding company; sold goods of Rs 5,00,000 to an ass…
- Mehta Pharma Ltd sold goods costing Rs 6,00,000 to its subsidiary Mehta Labs Ltd for Rs 8,00,000 during the year. Mehta Labs Ltd paid Rs 5,0…