CA Intermediate · Advanced Accounting · AS 18 Related Party Disclosures
Mr. Desai is a director of Kiran Ltd. and also holds 35% voting power in Lotus Pvt. Ltd., which sold machinery for ₹22,00,000 to Kiran Ltd. The transaction was at market price. Which statement is correct as per AS 18?
Lotus Pvt. Ltd. is a related party because a director of Kiran Ltd. holds 35% voting power in it. The ₹22,00,000 purchase must be disclosed with the nature of relationship, even though it was at market price.
- ADisclosure is not required since the transaction was at market price
- BDisclosure is required only if Kiran Ltd. is a listed company
- CLotus Pvt. Ltd. is a related party of Kiran Ltd. and the purchase must be disclosed, with the nature of relationship and amount, even though it was at arm's lengthCorrect
- DDisclosure is required only if Mr. Desai personally received a payment
Explanation
Mr. Desai is KMP, and holding 35% voting power gives him significant influence over Lotus, so Lotus is a related party. AS 18 requires disclosure irrespective of whether pricing is at market. Listing status and personal receipt are irrelevant.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on AS 18 Related Party Disclosures shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More AS 18 Related Party Disclosures questions
- Ganga Pharma Ltd is a subsidiary of Himalaya Holdings Ltd. During the year, Ganga lent Rs 50 lakh to Himalaya at 9% interest. Ganga also sol…
- Meru Textiles Ltd holds 30% of the equity shares of Kaveri Dyes Ltd, and the investment is treated as an associate. During the year Meru sol…
- Krishna Motors Ltd has a Director, Mr. Rao, whose wife is the sole proprietor of Rao Traders. During the year Krishna Motors sold goods to R…
- Meru Textiles Ltd's managing director, Mr. Anil Shah, owns 60% of Shah Dyes Pvt Ltd. During the year, Meru Textiles bought dyes worth ₹40 la…
- Under AS 18, in which situation is disclosure of related party transactions NOT required in the financial statements of a state-controlled e…
- Which of the following is NOT deemed a related party relationship merely by virtue of the stated relationship under AS 18?