CS Executive · Jurisprudence, Interpretation and General Laws · Law relating to Evidence
Mr. Iyer holds electronic records under his control which belong to a client, Ms. Shah, who would be entitled to refuse to produce them if they were in her control. Under the Act, when can Mr. Iyer be compelled to produce them?
Mr. Iyer can be compelled to produce the records only if Ms. Shah consents. Under section 136, no one is compelled to produce electronic records under his control which another person would be entitled to refuse to produce, unless that person consents.
- AOnly if Ms. Shah consents to their productionCorrect
- BWhenever the Court orders it, regardless of Ms. Shah's right
- COnly if the records are more than five years old
- DNever, even with Ms. Shah's consent
Explanation
Section 136 says no one shall be compelled to produce documents in his possession or electronic records under his control which another person would be entitled to refuse to produce, unless that other person consents. So Ms. Shah's consent is the only exception stated; age of record is irrelevant.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Law relating to Evidence shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Law relating to Evidence questions
- In a suit, defendant Nirmal calls his advocate Rao as a witness and asks him only about the date on which the advocate was engaged, a matter…
- Rohan sues Sameer on a written lease. The original lease is shown to be with Sameer, and Sameer does not produce it even after the notice re…
- An electronic record is produced in Court from a custody the Court considers proper and is proved to be six years old. It bears an electroni…
- Kiran and Lata have been openly running a boutique together, sharing profits and dealing with suppliers as partners. In a dispute, Lata argu…
- Anita Exports sues on a written agreement, the original of which is a public document. It seeks to give secondary evidence of its contents. …
- In a suit, plaintiff Harish gives evidence on his own behalf. His advocate's confidential communications with him are privileged. Which stat…