CS Executive · Economic, Commercial and Intellectual Property Laws · Prevention of Money Laundering
Mr. Iyer lives in a house that the Director has provisionally attached under Section 5(1) of the PMLA. Which statement is correct?
He may continue to enjoy the house. Section 5(4) provides that nothing in the section prevents a person interested in the enjoyment of immovable property attached provisionally from such enjoyment, and the term covers anyone claiming an interest in it.
- AHe must vacate immediately since attached property cannot be used
- BNothing in Section 5 prevents a person interested in the enjoyment of attached immovable property from such enjoymentCorrect
- CHe may enjoy it only after the Adjudicating Authority confirms the attachment
- DHe may enjoy it only if he pays rent to the Central Government
Explanation
Section 5(4) states that nothing in the section prevents the person interested in the enjoyment of attached immovable property from enjoying it. Person interested includes all persons claiming or entitled to claim any interest in the property. No confirmation or rent is required.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Prevention of Money Laundering shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Prevention of Money Laundering questions
- Ravi is accused of the offence of money-laundering under the PMLA, 2002. Where must the offence punishable under section 4 and any connected…
- A Special Court is trying a money-laundering case on a complaint filed by an authorised authority. As to cognizance, which statement fits se…
- A Special Court in India, trying an offence punishable under section 4, wants a summons to an accused to be served at a place in a contracti…
- Under Section 5(1), the first proviso bars attachment unless a scheduled offence report or complaint has been filed. An officer has recorded…
- Arjun applies for bail before the High Court in a case pending before a Special Court designated under the PMLA. What does section 44(2) say…
- Arjun is tried under Section 3 for laundering. The prosecution shows that one of three inter-connected transactions involved proceeds of cri…