NISM Certifications · NISM-Series-X-B: Investment Adviser (Level 2) · Basics of Behavioural Finance
Mr. Rao, a 45-year-old IT professional, bought shares of a company because his friend earned good returns on it. He ignored the fundamentals and his own risk profile. After the stock fell, he kept adding to the position, saying that his earlier decision could not have been wrong. Which pair of biases is most evident in his behaviour?
Mr. Rao shows herd behaviour by buying because a friend profited, and confirmation or commitment bias by adding to the losing position to justify his earlier decision. Neither mental accounting nor status quo bias explains both behaviours described.
- AHerd behaviour and confirmation or commitment biasCorrect
- BMental accounting and hindsight bias only
- CRepresentativeness and loss of liquidity illusion
- DStatus quo bias and framing
Explanation
Buying because a peer did so reflects herding or following others. Adding more to defend a prior decision and seeking to justify it reflects commitment or confirmation bias. The other pairs do not match both behaviours described.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Basics of Behavioural Finance shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Basics of Behavioural Finance questions
- Under prospect theory as developed by Kahneman and Tversky, which statement is correct about how people evaluate outcomes?
- Prospect theory, developed by Kahneman and Tversky, differs from expected utility theory mainly because it proposes that people:
- Ms. Kapoor received a Rs 5 lakh annual bonus and spends it freely on luxury travel, while carefully saving every rupee of her regular salary…
- Rohit, a salaried professional, refuses to sell a stock bought at ₹500 even though it now trades at ₹320 and his analysis shows poor prospec…
- Caselet: Mr. Rohan Mehta, 45, bought shares of a pharma company because its last three quarterly results were excellent and he assumes the t…
- An investor refuses to sell a stock that has fallen 30% below her purchase price, saying she will sell only when it returns to her cost. Whi…