CMA Final · Corporate and Economic Laws · Prevention of Oppression and Mismanagement
Mr. Rao, the managing director of Kaveri Textiles Ltd, ceased to hold office. His average annual remuneration over the preceding three years was Rs 40 lakh, and 5 years of his term remained. The company has not been wound up and none of the section 202(2) bars applies. What is the maximum compensation for loss of office permissible under section 202(3)?
The maximum is Rs 120 lakh. Section 202(3) limits compensation to remuneration for the remaining term or three years, whichever is shorter, at the three-year average. Since five years remain, three years applies, giving 3 x Rs 40 lakh.
- ARs 40 lakh
- BRs 80 lakh
- CRs 120 lakhCorrect
- DRs 200 lakh
Explanation
Section 202(3) caps the payment at remuneration for the remainder of the term or three years, whichever is shorter, computed on the average remuneration of the preceding three years. Remaining term is 5 years, so three years applies: 3 x Rs 40 lakh = Rs 120 lakh. Rs 200 lakh wrongly uses the full remaining term.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Prevention of Oppression and Mismanagement shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Prevention of Oppression and Mismanagement questions
- Under section 202 of the Companies Act, 2013, to which of the following persons may a company pay compensation for loss of office?
- Under section 202 of the Companies Act, 2013, in which of the following cases is payment of compensation for loss of office to a managing di…
- Under Section 202 of the Companies Act, 2013, Mr. Rao, a managing director of Kaveri Ltd, is removed from office. Which statement about comp…
- Under section 241(3), when the Central Government sees circumstances such as fraud, misfeasance or persistent negligence by a person concern…
- Under the Companies Act, 2013, which of the following is a ground on which a member may apply to the Tribunal for relief under Section 241(1…
- Under section 241(3), the Central Government may refer a case to the Tribunal against a person concerned in the management of a company. Wha…