NISM Certifications · NISM-Series-X-B: Investment Adviser (Level 2) · Risk Profiling for Investors
Mr. Rohit Bansal has a risk profile completed three years ago when he was single and renting. He has since married, bought a home with a large loan and had a child. What should the investment adviser do?
The adviser should update the risk profile, because major life changes such as marriage, a large home loan and a new child alter the client's risk capacity and financial needs. A risk profile is not permanent and should be reviewed periodically and whenever significant circumstances change.
- AContinue with the old profile since a risk profile is permanent
- BUpdate the risk profile because changes in life circumstances can alter risk capacity and needsCorrect
- CUpdate it only if the market index has fallen more than 10%
- DUpdate it only if Rohit requests a change in writing
Explanation
Marriage, a home loan and a child change income needs, liabilities and dependents, hence risk capacity. Risk profiles should be reviewed periodically and on major life events, not tied to index movements or only to client request.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Risk Profiling for Investors shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Risk Profiling for Investors questions
- In risk profiling of an investor, which of the following best describes 'risk capacity' as distinct from 'risk tolerance'?
- Mr. Anil Deshmukh, 58, is a government employee retiring in two years. He says he is comfortable with equity volatility and would like an ag…
- Which of the following is a recognised limitation of relying only on a self-completed risk profiling questionnaire?
- Mr. Raghav Menon, 58, is a government-school principal with a stable pension-eligible job, no loans, and ample savings. In the risk question…
- Which of the following is a recognised limitation of relying only on a standardised risk profiling questionnaire?
- Which of the following is a recognised limitation of relying only on a standard risk profiling questionnaire?