CA Intermediate · Advanced Accounting · AS 18 Related Party Disclosures
Nandi Steels Ltd is a wholly owned subsidiary of Himalaya Holdings Ltd. During 2025-26 it received a loan of ₹50 lakh from Himalaya Holdings at 9% interest. The Government of India holds 100% of Himalaya Holdings. Which statement is correct under AS 18 for Nandi Steels' financial statements?
Nandi Steels must disclose the loan and the interest as transactions with its holding company, Himalaya Holdings. Group relationships do not exempt disclosure, and the parent-subsidiary relationship itself must also be disclosed.
- AThe loan and interest must be disclosed as transactions with the holding company, a related partyCorrect
- BDisclosure is exempt because the loan is within the group
- CDisclosure is exempt because the ultimate owner is the Government
- DOnly the interest is disclosed, not the loan
Explanation
A holding company is a related party of its subsidiary, and both the loan and interest are transactions needing disclosure. AS 18 exempts state-controlled enterprises from disclosing transactions with other state-controlled enterprises, but the entity here is not simply a state-controlled enterprise in the exemption; the exemption relates to transactions with the state and other state-controlled enterprises, and the disclosure of control relationship still applies. The conservative ICAI-taught answer is disclosure.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on AS 18 Related Party Disclosures shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More AS 18 Related Party Disclosures questions
- Bhima Steels Ltd had these dealings with its associate, Cauvery Alloys Ltd, during the year: sold goods ₹80 lakh; purchased goods ₹30 lakh; …
- Rao Engineering Ltd has the following in the year: it sold goods of Rs 12,00,000 to its holding company; sold goods of Rs 5,00,000 to an ass…
- Arvind Ltd. (a company) and Bharat Ltd. are both subsidiaries of Chola Holdings Ltd. During the year Arvind Ltd. sold goods worth ₹18,00,000…
- Mehta Pharma Ltd sold goods costing Rs 6,00,000 to its subsidiary Mehta Labs Ltd for Rs 8,00,000 during the year. Mehta Labs Ltd paid Rs 5,0…
- Which of the following is a required disclosure under AS 18 when there have been transactions between related parties during the period?
- Rohan Ltd. sold goods of Rs 40,00,000 to Sunrise Ltd., its subsidiary, during the year. Rohan Ltd. also sold goods of Rs 10,00,000 to Tara L…