CMA Intermediate · Corporate Accounting and Auditing · National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA)
NFRA debars a chartered accountant firm after proving misconduct. Which statement conforms to Section 132(4)(c)(B)?
NFRA may debar the member or firm for a minimum of six months and a maximum of ten years, as it determines. The debarment covers appointment as auditor or internal auditor, undertaking audits, and valuations under section 247, not statutory audit alone.
- ADebarment can be for a minimum of six months and a maximum of ten years, as determined by NFRACorrect
- BDebarment must be for a fixed period of exactly five years
- CDebarment can be for a minimum of one year and up to life
- DDebarment can only apply to statutory audit and not to internal audit or valuation under section 247
Explanation
The section allows debarment from being appointed as auditor or internal auditor, undertaking audit, or performing valuation under section 247, for a minimum of six months and up to ten years as NFRA determines. The last option wrongly narrows the scope.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) questions
- For the purposes of NFRA's power to impose penalty, 'professional or other misconduct' under Section 132 has the meaning assigned to it in:
- Which statement about the executive body of the NFRA under section 132(3B) of the Companies Act, 2013 is correct?
- Which of the following is a power vested in NFRA, same as a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, while trying a suit, as per…
- Which of the following correctly describes the executive body of the NFRA under section 132 of the Companies Act, 2013?
- Under the Companies Act, 2013, which of the following is a function of the National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) under Section 132(2…
- CA Ravi Menon, an individual, received audit fees of Rs 8,00,000 from a company, and NFRA proves professional misconduct against him. Applyi…