CMA Intermediate · Corporate Accounting and Auditing · National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA)
NFRA proves misconduct by an audit firm and debars it under section 132(4)(c)(B). Which debarment is permissible under the section?
Debarment must be for at least six months and may be set by NFRA at a higher period not exceeding ten years. It bars the member or firm from audit, internal audit appointments and from performing valuation under section 247.
- AThree months, with no upper limit
- BAny period up to five years, with no minimum
- CA minimum of six months and a maximum of ten yearsCorrect
- DA minimum of one year and a maximum of fifteen years
Explanation
The debarment is for a minimum of six months or such higher period not exceeding ten years as NFRA determines. It covers appointment as auditor or internal auditor, undertaking audits, and valuations under section 247.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) questions
- A full-time member of the NFRA ceased to hold office on 31 March 2027. Applying the provisos to section 132(3), until what date must he stay…
- Once NFRA has initiated an investigation into the misconduct of a chartered accountant under section 132, what is the position of other inst…
- As per section 132(3) of the Companies Act, 2013, the NFRA consists of a chairperson and other members. What is the maximum number of such o…
- Under the Companies Act, 2013, which authority has the power to constitute the National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA), and by what me…
- CA firm Mehta & Associates is found by NFRA to have committed proved professional misconduct. The minimum penalty NFRA can impose on the fir…
- Under section 132 of the Companies Act, 2013, where is the head office of the NFRA located, and may it meet elsewhere?