CS Professional · Compliance Management, Audit and Due Diligence · Values, Ethics and Professional Conduct
On appeal by CS Neha Iyer against a Disciplinary Committee order imposing a fine of Rs 1 lakh, the Authority calls for the records and, after hearing both parties, finds the penalty too lenient for the proven misconduct. Which statement is correct under section 22E?
The Authority may enhance the penalty, provided it first gives the parties an opportunity of being heard. Section 22E(2) lets it confirm, modify or set aside the order, and impose, reduce or enhance penalty. Remitting the case is optional, not compulsory.
- AThe Authority may only confirm or set aside the order, and cannot alter the penalty
- BThe Authority may enhance the penalty, after giving the parties an opportunity of being heardCorrect
- CThe Authority may enhance the penalty without hearing the parties, since it is the final authority
- DThe Authority must remit the case to the Disciplinary Committee and cannot decide it itself
Explanation
Section 22E(2)(b) lets the Authority impose any penalty or set aside, reduce or enhance the penalty. The proviso requires it to give the parties an opportunity of being heard before passing any order. Remit is only one option, not mandatory, and the power is wider than confirm or set aside.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Values, Ethics and Professional Conduct shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Values, Ethics and Professional Conduct questions
- The Director (Discipline) of ICSI receives a complaint along with the prescribed fee against a practising Company Secretary, Meera. After ex…
- The Disciplinary Committee imposes a modest reprimand on CS Neha Gupta. The Director (Discipline), authorised by the Council, appeals to the…
- The Disciplinary Committee finds CS Arjun Rao guilty of Second Schedule misconduct after hearing him. What is the maximum fine it can impose…
- The Disciplinary Committee orders removal of CS Vikram Shah's name from the Register for two years. The order is communicated to him on 1 Ma…
- A company commits an offence under the Company Secretaries Act, 1980. The company secretary of the firm proves the offence occurred with no …
- CS Meera Iyer is asked by the promoter-director of Kaveri Agro Ltd to certify a compliance statement that she has not fully verified, with t…