Skip to content

CS Professional · Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) - Principles and Practice · Concept of Governance in Professional Managed Company and Promoters Driven Company

Orchid Foods Ltd has a professional CEO but the founder retains 30% and sits as a non-executive director. Analysts call it a hybrid. Which statement about governance in such a company is most accurate?

In a hybrid company, governance risks come from both sources: professional managers may pursue their own interests, and a significant shareholder like the founder may exert influence. The board therefore needs checks such as independent directors and committees. A non-executive role does not remove the need for governance.

  1. AGovernance risks can arise from both management agency conflicts and influence of a significant shareholder, so both need board checksCorrect
  2. BGovernance is not needed because the founder is non-executive
  3. COnly the SEBI regulations on promoters apply, not the board processes
  4. DIndependent directors are not allowed

Explanation

A hybrid structure carries both the manager-owner agency issue and the risk of a significant shareholder influencing decisions. Board checks such as independent directors and committees address both. A non-executive role does not remove influence, and board processes still apply.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Concept of Governance in Professional Managed Company and Promoters Driven Company shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Concept of Governance in Professional Managed Company and Promoters Driven Company questions