CA Final · Financial Reporting · Ind AS 111 Joint Arrangements
Orchid Pharma Ltd holds an interest in an arrangement that, after analysis, is found to be outside the scope of Ind AS 111 because no joint control exists. How should Orchid account for its interest in that arrangement?
Orchid should account for the interest under the relevant Ind AS, such as Ind AS 110, Ind AS 28 or Ind AS 109, depending on the control or influence it has. Ind AS 111 does not apply because the arrangement is outside its scope.
- AUnder Ind AS 111 as a joint operation by default
- BUnder the relevant Ind AS, such as Ind AS 110, Ind AS 28 or Ind AS 109Correct
- CUnder Ind AS 111 as a joint venture using the equity method
- DUnder Ind AS 37 as a contingent asset
Explanation
The application guidance in Ind AS 111 says that when an arrangement is outside its scope, the entity accounts for its interest under the relevant Ind AS, such as Ind AS 110, Ind AS 28 or Ind AS 109. Treating it under Ind AS 111 would be wrong because the Standard does not apply.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Ind AS 111 Joint Arrangements shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Ind AS 111 Joint Arrangements questions
- Aarav Ltd, Bhanu Ltd and Chetan Ltd are all subsidiaries of Promoter Holdings Ltd, the ultimate controlling party. Aarav Ltd acquires an int…
- Kiran Infra Ltd holds a 30% interest in an arrangement in which it has no joint control and only significant influence. Which accounting tre…
- Epsilon Ltd and Zeta Ltd, both controlled by Promoter Group P, hold joint control of a joint operation. Epsilon acquires an additional inter…
- A finance manager at Omega Ltd says that the Ind AS 111 appendix comparing it with IFRS 11 is binding on preparers. Which statement is corre…
- Sigma Ltd, Tau Ltd and Sigma's parent Omega Ltd are under common control of the same ultimate controlling party both before and after Sigma …
- Mehra Ltd holds a 50% interest in an arrangement with Sethi Ltd. The parties have no joint control because Mehra Ltd alone directs the relev…