CA Final · Financial Reporting · Ind AS 111 Joint Arrangements
Orchid Power Ltd's accountant makes four comments on the Ind AS 111 text. Which comment is consistent with the Standard?
The correct comment is that transitional provisions are placed in Ind AS 101 and not in Ind AS 111, while Ind AS 111 retains IFRS 11 paragraph numbers for consistency. The effective-date paragraph is omitted because the date is notified under the Companies Act.
- AParagraphs C1A and C1AA on transitional provisions are included in Ind AS 111 itself
- BParagraph C1 on the effective date is included because it is relevant to Ind AS 111
- CTransitional provisions are included in Ind AS 101 instead, while paragraph numbers of IFRS 11 are retained in Ind AS 111Correct
- DA joint arrangement can be neither a joint operation nor a joint venture
Explanation
Appendix 1 states that C1 (effective date) is not included as the date is notified under the Companies Act, and C1A and C1AA are not included because transitional provisions are in Ind AS 101. Paragraph numbers are retained to stay consistent with IFRS 11. The other comments contradict this, or contradict paragraph 6, under which a joint arrangement is either a joint operation or a joint venture.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Ind AS 111 Joint Arrangements shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Ind AS 111 Joint Arrangements questions
- Alpha Ltd and Beta Ltd, both Indian companies, sign a contractual arrangement under which they have joint control over a project to build a …
- IFRS 11 does not deal with acquisitions of joint operation interests under common control, whereas Ind AS 111 does through a reference to In…
- Gamma Ltd holds an interest in an arrangement that is found to be outside the scope of Ind AS 111 because no two parties have joint control.…
- Kaveri Textiles Ltd and Narmada Fabrics Ltd have an arrangement in which they hold joint control, and the contractual terms give them rights…
- Aarav Ltd, Bhanu Ltd and Chetan Ltd are all subsidiaries of Promoter Holdings Ltd, the ultimate controlling party. Aarav Ltd acquires an int…
- Vindhya Cement Ltd and Godavari Steel Ltd, both controlled by the same promoter group before and after the transaction, with control not tra…