CS Professional · Drafting, Pleadings and Appearances · Adjudications and Appeals under SEBI Laws
Rahul Mehta Securities Ltd. appeals to the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) against a SEBI order. The company argues that SAT must follow the detailed procedure of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 while hearing the appeal. Under the SEBI Act, 1992, which statement about SAT's procedure is correct?
SAT is not bound by the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. It is guided by the principles of natural justice and has power to regulate its own procedure, including where it sits, subject to the Act and the rules.
- ASAT must strictly follow the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 in every respect
- BSAT is not bound by the Code of Civil Procedure but is guided by the principles of natural justiceCorrect
- CSAT is bound by neither the Code of Civil Procedure nor the principles of natural justice
- DSAT must follow the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for all its procedure
Explanation
Section 15U(1) of the SEBI Act says SAT is not bound by the procedure laid down by the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, but is guided by the principles of natural justice. It can regulate its own procedure, including places of sitting. The option requiring strict CPC compliance contradicts this.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Adjudications and Appeals under SEBI Laws shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Adjudications and Appeals under SEBI Laws questions
- Vardhan Securities Ltd faces proceedings related to the holding and transfer of securities under the Depositories Act, 1996. It contends tha…
- A recognised stock exchange refused to list the securities of Sagar Infra Ltd and furnished its reasons on 10 June. Under section 22A of the…
- Pranav Depository Participants Pvt Ltd is aggrieved by a SAT order passed under the Depositories Act, 1996. It receives communication of the…
- During an appeal by Deshmukh Investments against an adjudicating officer's order under the SCRA, 1956, SAT wishes to have a witness examined…
- A depository's draft bye-laws, adopted without SEBI's approval, are challenged. Later SEBI, finding a bye-law inadequate, orders the deposit…
- Ketan Rao is being prosecuted before a Special Court established under the SEBI Act, 1992 for a securities offence. His counsel argues that …