CMA Foundation · Fundamentals of Business Laws and Business Communication · Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Ramesh, a holder, could not present a bill for payment on time because a flood cut off all roads to the drawee's town. The flood has now subsided. What must Ramesh do under the Act?
Ramesh must present the bill within a reasonable time after the flood, the cause of delay, ceases to operate. His delay is excused because it was beyond his control, but he cannot postpone presentment indefinitely once the obstacle is gone.
- APresent the bill within a reasonable time after the cause of delay ceases to operateCorrect
- BPresent it only after the next due date of the bill
- CTreat the bill as automatically discharged
- DWait until the drawee approaches him
Explanation
Delay caused by circumstances beyond the holder's control, such as a flood, is excused. But when the cause ceases, presentment must be made within a reasonable time. The bill is not discharged and he need not wait.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 questions
- B holds a bearer instrument and signs an indorsement reading 'Pay C only'. Which statement is correct under Section 50?
- A cheque issued to Meenakshi Exports is crossed specially to HDFC Bank. Which step may HDFC Bank take under the Act?
- Meera Traders issues a cheque to Kiran Suppliers. The cheque is dishonoured by the drawee bank. Under Section 30, the drawer's liability to …
- A promissory note states the maker will pay Rs. 10,000 to Vikram but specifies no time for payment. Under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 18…
- Rohit receives a cheque crossed generally with two parallel transverse lines. He writes the name of 'State Bank of India' between the lines.…
- Which of the following is a presumption that Section 118 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 makes until the contrary is proved?