CS Professional · Compliance Management, Audit and Due Diligence · Relief and Remedies
Ramesh is sued for breach of trust as an officer of Lotus Pharma Ltd. The court finds he is liable and that he acted honestly, but he failed to act reasonably in the circumstances. Is relief available under Section 463?
No. Section 463(1) requires that the officer acted honestly and reasonably, and that he ought fairly to be excused having regard to all circumstances. Since Ramesh did not act reasonably, the conditions are not met and neither full nor partial relief can be granted.
- ANo, because the court must find that he acted both honestly and reasonably and ought fairly to be excusedCorrect
- BYes, honesty alone is sufficient
- CYes, but only partial relief
- DYes, if the Registrar does not object
Explanation
Section 463(1) requires that the officer acted honestly and reasonably and, considering all circumstances including those connected with his appointment, ought fairly to be excused. Honesty alone is insufficient, so options B and C fail.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Relief and Remedies shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Relief and Remedies questions
- Anita, Company Secretary of Kaveri Foods Ltd, learns that shareholders may sue her over a certification she signed. No proceeding has yet be…
- Tribunal proceedings are pending against Prism Realty Ltd. The company argues that the Tribunal must strictly follow the Code of Civil Proce…
- In a criminal proceeding against Rohit, a director of Dhara Foods Ltd, for breach of trust, the court finds he acted honestly and reasonably…
- In a criminal prosecution against Mr. Vikram Shah, an officer of Ganga Steels Ltd, for breach of duty, the court is satisfied he acted hones…
- A High Court is considering an application by Neha, an officer of Pinnacle Steels Ltd, for relief from liability for misfeasance. The court …
- Before granting relief to an officer under section 463(1) or (2), which procedural step must the court complete?