CS Professional · Compliance Management, Audit and Due Diligence · Relief and Remedies
Tribunal proceedings are pending against Prism Realty Ltd. The company argues that the Tribunal must strictly follow the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and cannot dismiss its opponent's representation for default. Which statement correctly reflects section 424 of the Companies Act, 2013?
The Tribunal is not bound by the Code of Civil Procedure but is guided by natural justice and can regulate its own procedure. For specified matters it has civil court powers, including dismissing a representation for default or deciding it ex parte, under section 424.
- AThe Tribunal is bound by the CPC procedure and has no powers of a civil court
- BThe Tribunal is not bound by the CPC procedure but is guided by natural justice, and has civil court powers including dismissing a representation for default or deciding it ex parteCorrect
- CThe Tribunal may follow any procedure and is not required to observe natural justice
- DThe Tribunal has civil court powers only for summoning witnesses and none for receiving evidence on affidavits
Explanation
Section 424(1) says the Tribunal is not bound by the CPC procedure but is guided by natural justice and may regulate its own procedure, subject to the Act and rules. Section 424(2) gives it the powers of a civil court trying a suit, including summoning witnesses, discovery, evidence on affidavits, and dismissing a representation for default or deciding it ex parte. So the company's contention fails, and the option that denies natural justice is also wrong.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Relief and Remedies shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Relief and Remedies questions
- Meridian Textiles Ltd's company secretary, Ms. Kavita Rao, is sued in civil proceedings for negligence in filing a statutory return late. Th…
- Mehta Textiles Ltd's compliance officer, Rohan, filed a delayed return due to a software error and is now sued by the company for negligence…
- A court is hearing a criminal proceeding against Arjun, an officer of Neel Metals Ltd, for breach of trust. It finds he acted honestly and r…
- Vikram, an officer of Sagar Chemicals Ltd, faces a criminal prosecution for breach of duty and also a civil claim arising from the same brea…
- A High Court is inclined to excuse Sunita, an officer of Prabha Foods Ltd, on her application under Section 463. Which procedural step must …
- A company secretary asks which of the following facts is essential for a court to excuse an officer under Section 463(1). Which is correct?