CS Professional · Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) - Principles and Practice · Business Ethics, Code of Conduct and Anti-Bribery
Rohan, a public servant in a municipal licensing office, accepts a free holiday package without paying anything from Desai Builders, a firm whose building plan application is pending before his office. No request was made by Rohan and no bribe for a specific act is proven. Which provision most directly applies to Rohan under the text given?
Section 11 applies to Rohan. A public servant who accepts an undue advantage without consideration from a person he knows to be concerned in business before his office is punishable, and no proof of a specific favour in return is required.
- ASection 9, as he is a commercial organisation
- BSection 11, as a public servant accepting an undue advantage without consideration from a person concerned in business transacted by himCorrect
- CNo provision, because no specific official act in return is proven
- DSection 9, because Desai Builders is associated with him
Explanation
Section 11 punishes a public servant who accepts or obtains an undue advantage without consideration, or for inadequate consideration, from a person he knows to be concerned in business transacted by him. A proven quid pro quo is not an element. Section 9 concerns commercial organisations, not public servants, so options A and D are wrong. Punishment is imprisonment of not less than six months, extendable to five years, and fine.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Business Ethics, Code of Conduct and Anti-Bribery shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Business Ethics, Code of Conduct and Anti-Bribery questions
- Kaveri Textiles Ltd, incorporated in India, uses an external clearing agent, Mr Rao, to obtain port permissions. Without the company's knowl…
- Zenith Gadgets Inc., incorporated in the USA, runs a sales office in Pune, which is part of its business. Its Pune sales manager offers a cu…
- Orion Pharma Ltd is held liable under Section 9 after its sales head bribed a drug controller. The court finds that the company secretary, M…
- Bharat Infra Pvt Ltd, incorporated in India, uses an independent liaison agent, Mr. Rao, to secure a municipal tender. Without the company's…
- Kaveri Infra Ltd's board adopts an anti-bribery policy but never trains staff, never monitors its sales agents and does not review the polic…
- While drafting the anti-bribery section of the code of conduct, the company secretary of Sagar Pharma Ltd cites the short title of the legis…