CA Final · Indirect Tax Laws · Demands and Recovery
Sundaram Foods Ltd has gone into liquidation as contemplated under section 88 of the CGST Act. The department wants to recover tax and interest due from the company. As per the CGST Rules, what must the Commissioner do?
The Commissioner must notify the liquidator in FORM GST DRC-24 about the tax, interest, penalty or other amount due from the company in liquidation. This is the prescribed route for a company under liquidation under section 88; FORM GST DRC-07A is for demands under existing laws.
- AIssue a notice to the liquidator in FORM GST DRC-24 for recovery of the amount dueCorrect
- BAttach the personal property of the directors without involving the liquidator
- CUpload a summary of order in FORM GST DRC-07A on the portal
- DWait until liquidation ends and then issue a demand notice to the company
Explanation
The Rules provide that where the company is under liquidation as specified in section 88, the Commissioner notifies the liquidator for recovery of the tax, interest, penalty or other amount due in FORM GST DRC-24. FORM GST DRC-07A relates to summary of orders under existing laws, so it is not the relevant form here.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Demands and Recovery shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Demands and Recovery questions
- Vihaan Traders, Pune, received an order under section 73 demanding tax of ₹4,00,000 and the order has become final. It was served on 10 June…
- Vihaan Traders received an order under section 78 of the CGST Act, 2017 creating a tax demand. The order was served on 10 June. The proper o…
- An Input Service Distributor of Arjun Group distributed credit in contravention of section 20, so that Ruchi Ltd, one of the recipients, rec…
- Sundaram Textiles Ltd. was served an order under section 78 of the CGST Act requiring payment of a demand. The order was served on 10 June. …
- Rao Pharma has a section 73(9) order for 2019-20 and also a pending demand of Rs 3,00,000 that arose from an erroneous refund granted to it.…
- Tara Distributors, an Input Service Distributor, distributed credit in contravention of section 20 and so excess credit went to two recipien…