CA Final · Indirect Tax Laws · Payment of Tax
Sundaram Textiles Pvt Ltd, Coimbatore, owes GST of Rs 4,00,000 under the Act and applies electronically in FORM GST DRC-20 for payment in instalments. It has no ongoing recovery process for any default and was not refused the facility in the preceding financial year. Under the CGST Rules, 2017, what is the maximum number of monthly instalments the Commissioner can allow?
The Commissioner may allow at most twenty-four monthly instalments. After the DRC-20 application and a report on financial ability, the order in FORM GST DRC-21 can permit payment in monthly instalments not exceeding twenty-four, and no disqualifying condition applies to Sundaram Textiles here.
- ATwelve
- BEighteen
- CTwenty-fourCorrect
- DThirty-six
Explanation
Rule 158(2) allows the Commissioner, after considering the request and the jurisdictional officer's report, to issue an order in FORM GST DRC-21 allowing monthly instalments not exceeding twenty-four. The amount of Rs 4,00,000 exceeds the Rs 25,000 floor and no bar applies. Twelve, eighteen or thirty-six are not the limit in the Rules.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Payment of Tax shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Payment of Tax questions
- Vihaan Metals availed wrongly Rs 3,00,000 of ITC. Later, the electronic credit ledger balance fell to Rs 1,00,000 because of payment of tax …
- Nilgiri Tea Co. files its return after the due date, declaring supplies of the period. It deposited Rs 1,00,000 in the electronic cash ledge…
- Under Rule 88B(1) of the CGST Rules, 2017, a registered person files its return late, declaring all supplies, with no section 73 or 74 proce…
- Bharat Metals filed its return late. Rs 2,00,000 had been credited to its electronic cash ledger before the due date and stayed there untouc…
- Under rule 88B(3), for interest on input tax credit wrongly availed and utilised, when is the utilisation treated as having occurred if the …
- Vishal Engineering Ltd. wrongly availed ITC of ₹4,00,000 on 5 June. Its electronic credit ledger balance before the wrongful availment was ₹…