Skip to content

CFA Level I · CFA Level I Exam · Investors and Other Stakeholders

The board of a listed company is considering a proposal in which the CEO's long-term incentive pay vests entirely on one-year earnings per share growth. Which assessment of the proposal is most likely accurate from a governance perspective?

The proposal may encourage short-term actions that boost EPS at the expense of long-term value. A one-year earnings target rewards managers for cutting discretionary spending or managing earnings, so the pay structure does not align management with long-term shareholder interests.

  1. AIt aligns management with long-term shareholder value because EPS is audited
  2. BIt may encourage short-term actions that boost EPS at the expense of long-term valueCorrect
  3. CIt reduces agency conflicts because it removes any role for the compensation committee

Explanation

Tying vesting to a one-year metric can motivate managers to cut investment, buy back shares or manage earnings to hit targets, harming long-term value. Audited EPS does not fix the short horizon, and removing committee oversight would weaken governance.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Investors and Other Stakeholders shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Investors and Other Stakeholders questions