CMA Foundation · Fundamentals of Business Economics and Management · Stewardship Theory and Agency Theory of Management
The core assumption about human behaviour in agency theory, which creates the agency problem between owners and managers, is that:
Agency theory assumes both principal and agent are self-interested utility maximisers, so their goals may diverge. A manager may pursue personal benefits instead of maximising shareholder wealth, creating the agency problem. Assuming managers always put organisational goals first belongs to stewardship theory instead.
- AManagers always place organisational goals above personal goals
- BBoth principal and agent are self-interested utility maximisers whose goals may conflictCorrect
- CManagers are motivated only by intrinsic rewards such as recognition
- DOwners and managers always share identical risk preferences
Explanation
Agency theory assumes individuals act in self-interest, so the agent may pursue personal benefits rather than the principal's wealth maximisation. This conflict of interest causes the agency problem. The first option describes stewardship theory, which is the opposite view.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Stewardship Theory and Agency Theory of Management shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Stewardship Theory and Agency Theory of Management questions
- Which statement about the stewardship theory view of the principal-manager relationship is correct?
- In agency theory, the party who delegates decision-making authority to another person to act on its behalf is called the:
- Which kind of motivation does stewardship theory emphasise for a manager, as opposed to agency theory?
- Shareholders of Kaveri Ltd. spend ₹4 lakh on auditors and board monitoring, the manager spends ₹1 lakh on bonding (reports and guarantees), …
- Under stewardship theory, which of the following is the most likely source of a steward's motivation?
- Which governance arrangement is most consistent with stewardship theory?