CA Final · Indirect Tax Laws · Returns
The registration of Meena Agro Pvt Ltd was cancelled by the proper officer on his own motion for failure to furnish returns. The order of cancellation was served on 10 June. The company applies for revocation on 20 July. Which statement is correct under Rule 23 of the CGST Rules, 2017?
The application is within the ninety-day period, but it can be filed only after the defaulted returns are furnished and the tax, interest, penalty and late fee on them are paid. Rule 23 bars an application for revocation otherwise when cancellation was for failure to furnish returns.
- AThe application is within time, but it can be filed only after the returns are furnished and tax, interest, penalty and late fee in respect of those returns are paidCorrect
- BThe application is time-barred as it must be filed within thirty days
- CThe application can be filed without furnishing returns, which can be filed within ninety days after revocation
- DThe application must be filed in FORM GST REG-23 to the Commissioner
Explanation
The application in FORM GST REG-21 must be made within ninety days of service of the order, and 20 July is within that. Where cancellation was for non-furnishing of returns, no application can be filed unless those returns are furnished and tax, interest, penalty and late fee in terms of them are paid. Returns for the period after cancellation are due within thirty days of the revocation order, not these.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Returns shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Returns questions
- Kaveri Textiles Ltd's return for March was selected for scrutiny. The proper officer noticed a mismatch between the turnover declared and th…
- Under rule 23, a proper officer is satisfied that sufficient grounds exist for revoking the cancellation of registration of Anand Foods. Wit…
- Under the CGST Rules, 2017, Rajan Traders accepted a discrepancy pointed out in FORM GST ASMT-10 and paid the tax and interest. Which course…
- During scrutiny, the proper officer informed Ritu Enterprises of discrepancies in its return. Ritu accepted the discrepancies but did not ma…
- The registration of Rao Enterprises was cancelled by the proper officer on his own motion for failure to furnish returns, and the order was …
- Registration of Anand Components was cancelled by the proper officer. The cancellation order was served on 1 April, and revocation was appli…