CS Professional · Compliance Management, Audit and Due Diligence · Relief and Remedies
The Tribunal passes an order against Orchid Pharma Ltd., whose registered office is in Pune, while its plant manager Mr. Vikas Joshi, against whom a separate order is made, carries on business in Nagpur. Under section 424(3), to which courts may the Tribunal send these orders for execution?
The company's order goes to the court having jurisdiction over its registered office in Pune, while Mr. Joshi's order goes to the court where he voluntarily resides, carries on business or personally works for gain. Section 424(3) draws this distinction between companies and other persons.
- ABoth to the court in Pune, the company's registered office
- BThe company's order to the court at Pune; Mr. Joshi's order to the court within whose jurisdiction he voluntarily resides, carries on business or personally works for gainCorrect
- CBoth to the High Court at the Tribunal's own seat only
- DCompany's order to the court where its plant is located; Mr. Joshi's order to the court at Pune
Explanation
Section 424(3) treats Tribunal orders as decrees and lets the Tribunal send them for execution to the court within whose local limits, for an order against a company, its registered office is situated, and for an order against any other person, that person voluntarily resides, carries on business or personally works for gain. Hence Pune for the company and the relevant locality for Mr. Joshi, not Pune for both.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Relief and Remedies shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Relief and Remedies questions
- Meridian Textiles Ltd's company secretary, Ms. Kavita Rao, is sued in civil proceedings for negligence in filing a statutory return late. Th…
- Mehta Textiles Ltd's compliance officer, Rohan, filed a delayed return due to a software error and is now sued by the company for negligence…
- A court is hearing a criminal proceeding against Arjun, an officer of Neel Metals Ltd, for breach of trust. It finds he acted honestly and r…
- A High Court is inclined to excuse Sunita, an officer of Prabha Foods Ltd, on her application under Section 463. Which procedural step must …
- A company secretary asks which of the following facts is essential for a court to excuse an officer under Section 463(1). Which is correct?
- Before granting relief to an officer of Deccan Cables Ltd under the court's power to excuse honest and reasonable officers, the court wants …