NISM Certifications · NISM-Series-V-A: Mutual Fund Distributors · Mutual Fund Scheme Selection
Two direct-plan equity schemes have the same gross portfolio return of 12.0% a year before expenses. Scheme X has a total expense ratio of 0.8% and Scheme Y has 1.5%. Assuming returns are net of the expense ratio and compounding annually for 10 years on Rs 1,00,000, approximately how much more will Scheme X be worth than Scheme Y? (Use 1.112^10 ≈ 2.869 and 1.105^10 ≈ 2.714)
Scheme X will be worth about Rs 15,500 more. Net returns are 11.2% and 10.5%, giving Rs 2,86,900 and Rs 2,71,400 after 10 years of compounding on Rs 1,00,000. The lower expense ratio compounds into a meaningful difference.
- ARs 15,500Correct
- BRs 7,000
- CRs 30,900
- DRs 1,55,000
Explanation
Net return X = 12.0 − 0.8 = 11.2%, Y = 12.0 − 1.5 = 10.5%. Value X = 1,00,000 × 2.869 = Rs 2,86,900. Value Y = 1,00,000 × 2.714 = Rs 2,71,400. Difference = Rs 15,500. Using the 0.7% gap simply on the principal would give Rs 7,000, which ignores compounding.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Mutual Fund Scheme Selection shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Mutual Fund Scheme Selection questions
- While comparing two large-cap equity funds, a distributor notes that Fund A has a five-year return of 12% with a standard deviation of 18%, …
- While comparing two diversified equity funds, a distributor notes that Fund A has a beta of 0.8 and Fund B has a beta of 1.2 against the sam…
- An investor in the 30% tax bracket wants equity exposure but also wants to use a scheme that qualifies for equity taxation without holding d…
- An investor needs money in about 2 years for a down payment and has low risk tolerance. A distributor wants to avoid the main risk that woul…
- A distributor is helping an investor who wants to hold a mutual fund for 10 years and is comfortable with market ups and downs. Which factor…
- A client wants to compare a growth option scheme with a benchmark over the same period. The scheme gave a return of 11% and its benchmark ga…