ACCA Applied Skills · Corporate and Business Law (Global) · Obligations of the seller and buyer, and provisions common to both
Under a CISG contract, Lumo Ltd sold 500 cartons of tinned fruit to Verda Ltd. The goods were being carried by sea when the contract was made. Lumo knew before contracting that the goods had already been damaged by a storm, but did not tell Verda. Which statement is correct about who bears the risk for the damage?
Lumo bears the risk. Although risk in goods sold in transit can pass to the buyer retrospectively from handover to the carrier, this does not apply where the seller knew of the damage at contracting and failed to disclose it to the buyer.
- AVerda bears it, because risk is treated as passing from the time goods were handed to the carrier
- BLumo bears it, because it knew of the damage and did not disclose it to the buyerCorrect
- CLumo bears it only if Verda had already paid the full price before the damage was found
Explanation
For goods sold in transit, risk may pass from the time of handing over to the carrier, but if the seller knew or ought to have known of the loss or damage and did not tell the buyer, the damage stays at the seller's risk. Option A ignores this exception. Payment is irrelevant to the rule.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Obligations of the seller and buyer, and provisions common to both shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Obligations of the seller and buyer, and provisions common to both questions
- Evermont Ltd received a delivery of goods from Fargo Inc under a CISG contract. The goods were visibly the wrong colour. Evermont did nothin…
- Veltro Ltd (seller) agreed to sell machine parts to Marenza SA (buyer) under a contract governed by the CISG. The contract is silent on the …
- Lumina Ltd (seller) agreed under a contract governed by the CISG to deliver 10 consignments of components to Brandt GmbH (buyer), one each m…
- Under the CISG, Tanto Co (buyer) has received goods from Vela Co (seller) but intends to reject them as non-conforming. Tanto Co is in posse…
- Under the CISG, Delmar Co failed to pay the price of goods on the due date. The contract said nothing about interest. Which statement is cor…
- Under a CISG contract, Carvet Ltd sold goods to Mendo Co. Mendo avoided the contract for a fundamental breach and must return the goods. Bef…