FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Netting, Close-out and Related Aspects
Under an ISDA Master Agreement with close-out netting, Bank A has four trades with Counterparty B at the early termination date, with mark-to-market values to A of +30 million, +20 million, -35 million and -5 million (USD). No collateral is held and A is the non-defaulting party. Ignoring close-out costs, what is the amount owed and by whom?
The net close-out amount is USD 10 million payable by Counterparty B to Bank A, because 30 plus 20 minus 35 minus 5 equals plus 10. Netting offsets the negative-value trades against the positive ones, reducing exposure from 50 million gross.
- AB owes A USD 50 million
- BB owes A USD 10 millionCorrect
- CA owes B USD 10 million
- DA owes B USD 40 million
Explanation
Net = 30 + 20 - 35 - 5 = +10 million in favour of A, so B owes A USD 10 million. Gross positive exposure of 50 million would apply only if netting were unenforceable and A had to pay its own negative trades in full.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Netting, Close-out and Related Aspects shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Netting, Close-out and Related Aspects questions
- Which feature of a close-out netting process is most likely to create disputes and residual risk for the non-defaulting party after the even…
- A bank has three derivatives with a defaulted counterparty under an enforceable netting agreement, with close-out values to the bank of +USD…
- A dealer closes out a portfolio with a defaulted counterparty. Market quotes for one illiquid exotic trade are unavailable and bid-offer spr…
- A risk manager explains why close-out netting is important when a counterparty becomes insolvent. Which statement best captures the key lega…
- A risk manager reviews a netting set where legal opinion confirms close-out netting is enforceable in the counterparty's jurisdiction, and t…
- Two portfolios with the same counterparty are netted under one agreement. Trade A has an expected positive exposure of 30 million and trade …