CS Professional · Corporate Restructuring, Valuation and Insolvency · Liquidation on or after Failing of Resolution Plan
Under liquidation ordered on 1 July 2026, the committee of creditors recommended exploring a compromise under section 230 of the Companies Act, 2013. A proposal approved by the requisite majority of creditors offers them Rs 40 crore, while the liquidation value fixed as on the insolvency commencement date was Rs 46 crore. A proposer is a person ineligible to submit a resolution plan. Which view is correct under the Liquidation Process Regulations as amended up to 22-09-2026?
The liquidator should not file the proposal. Filing requires both creditor approval by the requisite majority and an amount realisable higher than the liquidation value as on the insolvency commencement date; Rs 40 crore is below Rs 46 crore. Also, a person ineligible to submit a resolution plan cannot be a party.
- AThe liquidator should not file it, since the amount realisable is not higher than the liquidation value, and an ineligible person cannot be a party to the compromiseCorrect
- BThe liquidator must file it because the creditors approved it by the requisite majority
- CThe liquidator may file it after the ninety-day period if the Tribunal permits
- DThe liquidator may file it, as the ineligible person can join if bearing the costs
Explanation
Regulation 2B requires both requisite creditor approval and that the amount realisable to creditors exceed the liquidation value determined as on the insolvency commencement date. Here Rs 40 crore is below Rs 46 crore, so the second condition fails. Additionally, a person ineligible to submit a resolution plan cannot be a party to the compromise in any manner. Creditor approval alone is insufficient.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Liquidation on or after Failing of Resolution Plan shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Liquidation on or after Failing of Resolution Plan questions
- The Adjudicating Authority directs the Board to propose a replacement liquidator for Sundaram Plastics Ltd. Within how many days must the Bo…
- On appointment of liquidator Mr. Desai for Himalaya Agro Ltd, the managing director claims he still controls day-to-day decisions as a direc…
- Vindhya Textiles Ltd is in liquidation. The liquidator, after verifying a creditor's claim, decides to reject it in part. Which statement co…
- A creditor, Sundaram Finance Co, with the knowledge and authorisation of its director Ms. Iyer, initiates recovery action against a corporat…
- Kaveri Foods Ltd's liquidation order was passed on 1 March. The aggrieved promoter files an appeal to the NCLAT on 20 April, alleging fraud …
- In the liquidation of Gange Foods Ltd, sale proceeds are limited. Which of the following ranks lowest in the order of priority under section…