CMA Foundation · Fundamentals of Business Laws and Business Communication · Consideration and Legality of Object
Under Section 24 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, what is the legal effect when any part of a single consideration for one or more objects is unlawful?
The agreement is void. Section 24 provides that where any part of a single consideration for one or more objects, or any part of one of several considerations for a single object, is unlawful, the whole agreement is void. The lawful portion is not saved.
- AThe agreement is voidCorrect
- BThe agreement is voidable at the option of the innocent party
- CThe lawful part is enforceable and the unlawful part is struck out
- DThe agreement is valid but unenforceable until the Court approves
Explanation
Section 24 says that if any part of a single consideration for one or more objects, or any part of any one of several considerations for a single object, is unlawful, the agreement is void. The text makes no provision for severing the lawful part, so the option that enforces the lawful part is wrong.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Consideration and Legality of Object shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Consideration and Legality of Object questions
- In the Section 24 illustration, A promises to superintend a legal manufacture of indigo and an illegal traffic in other articles, and B prom…
- Vikram, who has instituted a prosecution against Imran for robbery, promises to drop it if Imran restores the value of the stolen goods, and…
- Kiran promises to drop a prosecution for robbery that he has instituted against Bhavesh, and Bhavesh promises to pay Kiran the value of the …
- Which of the following is NOT one of the grounds on which Section 23 treats a consideration or object as unlawful?
- Mehta Traders engages Rohan for a yearly salary of ₹6,00,000 to manage its lawful cloth export business and also to run an illegal traffic i…
- A sells and delivers goods to B on credit. Later, C, without any consideration, promises A in an agreement to pay for the goods if B default…