CMA Foundation · Fundamentals of Business Laws and Business Communication · Consideration and Legality of Object
Under Section 2(d) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, an act, abstinence or promise is a consideration for a promise when it is done or promised:
Consideration under Section 2(d) arises when the promisee or any other person acts, abstains, or promises to do so at the desire of the promisor. The promisor's desire is essential, and the act need not come only from the promisee.
- AAt the desire of the promisor, by the promisee or any other personCorrect
- BAt the desire of the promisee, by the promisor only
- CAt the desire of a third party, by the promisee only
- DBy the promisee on his own initiative, without any desire from the promisor
Explanation
Section 2(d) requires that the act, abstinence or promise be done at the desire of the promisor. It may be done by the promisee or any other person. Option B reverses the roles of the parties, and option D ignores the requirement of the promisor's desire.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Consideration and Legality of Object shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Consideration and Legality of Object questions
- Ramesh promises to give his friend Suresh Rs. 5,000 as a gift, without receiving anything in return. The promise is oral and Suresh has done…
- Rohan asks his friend Meera to lend Rs 20,000 to Sameer, and Meera does so. In Rohan's promise to repay if Sameer defaults, what is the effe…
- Asha promises to pay Vikram ₹50,000 in return for two things, namely, delivering her goods to Kochi, which is lawful, and bribing a governme…
- Arjun found the lost wallet of Kiran, a stranger, and returned it without being asked. Later Kiran promised Arjun Rs. 500 for this act. Whic…
- Vijay owes Rs. 20,000 to Hari, but the debt is barred by the law of limitation. Vijay now signs a written promise to pay Hari Rs. 8,000 towa…
- Which of the following is an exception where the Indian Contract Act, 1872 states that no consideration is necessary?