CMA Final · Direct Tax Laws and International Taxation · Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements (DTAA)
Under the Income-tax Act, 2025, an Indian resident's assessment is governed by a notified agreement under section 159. Which statement about the interaction between the Act and the agreement is correct?
The Act applies to the extent it is more beneficial to the assessee covered by the agreement, but Chapter XI applies even if it is not beneficial. This follows from section 159(4) read with section 159(6).
- AThe agreement always overrides the Act, even where the Act is more beneficial
- BThe Act always overrides the agreement
- CThe provisions of the Act apply to the extent they are more beneficial to the assessee, but Chapter XI applies even if not beneficialCorrect
- DChapter XI applies only where it is more beneficial to the assessee
Explanation
Section 159(4) provides that the Act's provisions apply to the extent more beneficial to the assessee covered by the agreement. Section 159(6) overrides this for Chapter XI, which applies even when not beneficial. The other options misstate one or both rules.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements (DTAA) shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements (DTAA) questions
- Under the Income-tax Act, 2025, when a term used in a DTAA is not defined in the agreement but is defined in the Act, which meaning applies?
- Mr. Arvind, a non-resident, wants to claim relief under a DTAA entered into by India. Under the Income-tax Act, 2025, which condition must h…
- Under the Income-tax Act, 2025, an assessee who is not a resident in India wants to claim relief under a tax treaty notified under section 1…
- Under the Income-tax Act, 2025, an assessee who is not a resident wants to claim relief under a tax treaty entered into by the Central Gover…
- Which statement about section 159 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 is correct?
- A treaty uses the term 'royalty' but does not define it. The term is also not defined in the Act or any notification under section 159(7)(b)…