CA Final · Indirect Tax Laws · Levy of and Exemptions from Customs Duty
Veda Imports Pvt Ltd, Chennai, was held by an order under section 28(8) of the Customs Act, 1962 to have short-paid duty of Rs 8,00,000 by reason of wilful mis-statement of facts. No penalty under section 112 or 114 has been imposed. Veda pays the duty, the interest due under section 28AA and the penalty determined, all within thirty days of the communication of the order. What is the penalty payable under section 114A?
The penalty is Rs 2,00,000. Section 114A normally imposes a penalty equal to the duty determined where there is wilful mis-statement or suppression. If duty, interest and the penalty are paid within thirty days of the order's communication, the penalty reduces to 25% of the duty, which is 25% of Rs 8,00,000.
- ARs 8,00,000, being 100% of the duty
- BRs 2,00,000, being 25% of the dutyCorrect
- CRs 4,00,000, being 50% of the duty
- DNil, because no penalty arises if duty is paid within thirty days
Explanation
Section 114A provides for a penalty equal to the duty determined. Under the first proviso, if the duty, interest and the penalty are paid within thirty days of communication of the order, the penalty is 25% of the duty. 25% of Rs 8,00,000 is Rs 2,00,000. Rs 8,00,000 is wrong because it ignores the proviso benefit.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Levy of and Exemptions from Customs Duty shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Levy of and Exemptions from Customs Duty questions
- For years, importers of a chemical at Mundra paid no duty because of a generally prevalent practice, though the goods were actually dutiable…
- For years, importers of a chemical at Mundra paid no duty because of a generally prevalent practice, though the chemical was actually dutiab…
- Sunrise Traders Pvt Ltd of Surat imported machinery and, by reason of a wilful mis-statement of facts, paid less customs duty. The proper of…
- Himalaya Foods Ltd was penalised under section 114A for collusion-based short levy on imported ingredients. The department also proposes to …
- The Central Government notifies under section 28A that, because of a generally prevalent practice, duty on a certain imported good will not …
- A group of importers had for years paid a lower duty on a product because customs ports generally followed a prevalent practice, though the …