Skip to content

ACCA Strategic Professional · Strategic Business Leader · Leadership and organisational culture

Wexley Pharma's board considers appointing a chief executive. Fiedler's contingency theory suggests that leader effectiveness depends on matching the leader's orientation to situational favourability. The situation is highly unfavourable: poor leader-member relations, an unstructured task and weak position power. According to the theory, which leader would be most effective?

A task-oriented, low LPC leader would be most effective. Fiedler's contingency theory finds such leaders perform best when the situation is either highly favourable or highly unfavourable, while relationship-oriented leaders do better in moderate situations. Fiedler also treated style as fixed, so the situation should be changed or the leader matched to it.

  1. AA task-oriented (low LPC) leaderCorrect
  2. BA relationship-oriented (high LPC) leader
  3. CAny leader after training in situational flexibility
  4. DA leader who changes style daily to suit each follower

Explanation

Fiedler found task-oriented, low LPC leaders perform best in very favourable and very unfavourable situations, and relationship-oriented, high LPC leaders perform best in moderately favourable ones. The situation here is very unfavourable, so a task-oriented leader fits. Fiedler also held that leader style is relatively fixed, so flexible-style options contradict the theory.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Leadership and organisational culture shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Leadership and organisational culture questions