IAI Actuarial Core Principles · Risk Modelling and Survival Analysis · Mortality projection
When fitting a Poisson Lee-Carter model, deaths D(x,t) are assumed Poisson with mean E(x,t)m(x,t). Which is a consequence of this assumption that is relevant to parameter uncertainty?
Under the Poisson assumption, parameters are estimated by maximum likelihood, and the inverse Fisher information gives approximate standard errors, which measure parameter uncertainty. The estimates are not exact, identifiability constraints are still required, and k(t) must still be projected.
- AParameters are estimated by maximum likelihood, and the inverse of the Fisher information gives approximate standard errors for the estimatesCorrect
- BThe variance of deaths is assumed to be constant across all ages
- CThe model needs no identifiability constraints on b(x) and k(t)
- DParameter estimates are exact, so only process risk remains
- The assumption removes the need to project k(t) in the future
Explanation
Poisson likelihood allows maximum likelihood estimation, with asymptotic standard errors from the information matrix, quantifying parameter uncertainty. Variance equals the mean, so it varies with exposure and rate. Constraints on b(x) and k(t) are still needed for identifiability, and k(t) still has to be projected.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Mortality projection shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Mortality projection questions
- Under a Lee-Carter model, ln m(x,t) = a(x) + b(x)k(t). Which statement about the parameters is correct?
- A Cairns-Blake-Dowd (CBD) model is fitted with logit q(x,t) = k1(t) + k2(t)(x - xbar). Which statement is correct?
- Lee-Carter parameters are fitted by singular value decomposition (SVD) of the matrix of centred log rates. Which statement about this approa…
- In a Lee-Carter model, log m(x,t) = a(x) + b(x)k(t) + ε(x,t). Which statement about the parameters is correct?
- A Lee-Carter model is fitted with k(t) forecast as a random walk with drift: k(t+1) = k(t) + d + e(t), where d = −1.5 and e(t) has standard …
- Which is a recognised criticism of the 'explanatory' (cause-of-death) approach to mortality projection?