ACCA Applied Knowledge · Management Accounting · Alternative cost accounting principles
Which action is most consistent with reducing a product's life cycle cost, given that a high proportion of costs are committed at the design stage?
Spending more on design is the best action, because most of a product's lifetime costs are committed at the design stage. Extra upfront design effort can reduce later production, servicing and disposal costs and so lowers the total life cycle cost.
- ASpending more on design to reduce later production and disposal costsCorrect
- BDelaying all cost analysis until production begins
- CCutting marketing spending only after launch
- DIgnoring disposal costs as they occur last
Explanation
Most of a product's lifetime costs are determined at the design stage, so extra design spending can reduce later production, service and disposal costs. Delaying analysis means missing the chance to influence committed costs. Disposal costs form part of whole-life cost.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Alternative cost accounting principles shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Alternative cost accounting principles questions
- Karo Ltd had opening inventory of 3,000 units and closing inventory of 1,000 units. The fixed overhead absorption rate was $8 per unit in bo…
- Dorne Co is launching a product. Market research shows 8,000 units can be sold over its life at $60 per unit. The required lifetime profit i…
- A product is expected to sell 10,000 units over its life at $20 per unit. Lifetime costs are: design and development $40,000; production $8 …
- Karo Co absorbs overheads on direct labour hours. Its budgeted overhead is $300,000 and budgeted labour hours are 50,000. Under ABC, product…
- A product has a life cycle cost profile as follows: design and development $120,000; production $380,000; marketing $100,000; end-of-life di…
- Which of the following best describes a cost driver in activity based costing?