ACCA Applied Knowledge · Management Accounting · Alternative cost accounting principles
Karo Co absorbs overheads on direct labour hours. Its budgeted overhead is $300,000 and budgeted labour hours are 50,000. Under ABC, product Q is allocated $45,000 of overhead for 5,000 units. Q uses 2 labour hours per unit. By how much does the overhead cost per unit of Q under ABC differ from the traditional cost per unit?
ABC gives a cost per unit that is $3 lower than the traditional method. Traditional absorption uses $6 per labour hour, so 2 hours cost $12 per unit. ABC allocates $45,000 across 5,000 units, which is $9 per unit.
- AABC is $3 per unit lower
- BABC is $3 per unit higherCorrect
- CABC is $9 per unit higher
- DABC is $12 per unit lower
Explanation
Traditional rate = $300,000/50,000 = $6 per hour; per unit = 2 x $6 = $12. ABC per unit = $45,000/5,000 = $9. ABC is $3 lower, not higher. Therefore the correct comparison is ABC $3 lower.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Alternative cost accounting principles shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Alternative cost accounting principles questions
- A product sells for $50 per unit and uses materials costing $20 per unit. Labour and overhead (factory cost) total $300,000 per period. The …
- Harlow Co makes products X and Y. Overheads are $240,000 and are currently absorbed on direct labour hours: X uses 6,000 hours and Y uses 4,…
- In a period, absorption costing profit was $5,000 lower than marginal costing profit. The fixed overhead absorption rate was $4 per unit and…
- In a period, absorption costing profit was $15,000 lower than marginal costing profit. The fixed production overhead absorption rate was $5 …
- Which statement about marginal and absorption costing profits over the whole life of a product is correct, assuming costs are unchanged and …
- Which of the following best describes a cost driver in activity based costing?