Skip to content

ACCA Strategic Professional · Advanced Financial Management · Financial reconstruction

Which of the following is a recognised reason for a company undertaking a financial reconstruction rather than going into liquidation?

Financial reconstruction makes sense when creditors expect to recover more from a continuing business under revised terms, such as debt-for-equity swaps, than from a break-up sale. If liquidation value were higher, creditors would prefer liquidation instead.

  1. AThe liquidation value of assets exceeds the going-concern value, so creditors prefer continuation
  2. BCreditors expect to recover more from the continuing business under revised terms than from a break-up saleCorrect
  3. CShareholders wish to maximise the immediate cash payout from asset disposals
  4. DDirectors want to avoid any negotiation with lenders

Explanation

Reconstruction is sensible when going-concern value exceeds liquidation value, so creditors and others do better by agreeing revised terms. If liquidation value were higher, liquidation would be preferred, so the first option is wrong.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Financial reconstruction shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Financial reconstruction questions