ACCA Applied Knowledge · Management Accounting · Reconciliation of budgeted and actual profit
Which of the following is the most likely cause of an adverse labour rate variance combined with a favourable labour efficiency variance?
Using higher-grade, more skilled workers than the standard assumed is the likely cause. They are paid more per hour, giving an adverse rate variance, but they work faster and produce output in fewer hours, giving a favourable efficiency variance.
- AUse of higher-grade, more skilled workers than the standard assumedCorrect
- BPoor quality materials causing more rework
- CLack of supervision leading to slow working
- DA machine breakdown causing idle time
Explanation
Skilled workers cost more per hour (adverse rate) but work faster (favourable efficiency). Poor materials, weak supervision and breakdowns would cause adverse efficiency or idle time, not a favourable efficiency variance.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Reconciliation of budgeted and actual profit shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Reconciliation of budgeted and actual profit questions
- Standard variable overhead is $4 per labour hour, with 2 hours allowed per unit. In a period, 1,500 units were produced using 3,100 hours (a…
- Which situation is the most likely explanation for an adverse material usage variance combined with a favourable labour rate variance?
- Zeta Ltd budgeted to sell 2,000 units at a standard selling price of $50 per unit. Actual sales were 2,000 units at $52 per unit. What is th…
- Which of the following is the most likely explanation of an adverse material price variance combined with a favourable material usage varian…
- Zeta Ltd's standard labour rate is $12 per hour. In May, 4,500 hours were paid for at a total cost of $56,250, and all hours paid were worke…
- A company replaces skilled workers with cheaper, less experienced staff to reduce wage costs. Which pair of labour variances is most likely …