Skip to content

CFA Level I · CFA Level I Exam · Corporate Governance: Conflicts, Mechanisms, Risks, and Benefits

Which of the following is the most likely consequence for a company whose weak governance leads to repeated related-party dealings and poor transparency?

The most likely consequence is a higher risk of legal, reputational, and regulatory penalties. Weak transparency and repeated related-party dealings invite scrutiny, sanctions and loss of investor trust, and usually raise the firm's financing costs rather than lower them.

  1. AA lower cost of debt due to higher perceived disclosure
  2. BA higher risk of legal, reputational, and regulatory penaltiesCorrect
  3. CA stronger bargaining position with suppliers

Explanation

Poor transparency and abusive related-party dealings raise the chance of fraud findings, lawsuits, regulatory sanctions and reputational damage, and typically raise financing costs rather than lower them.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Corporate Governance: Conflicts, Mechanisms, Risks, and Benefits shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Corporate Governance: Conflicts, Mechanisms, Risks, and Benefits questions