IAI Actuarial Core Principles · Economic Modelling · Measures of investment risk
Which statement about Value at Risk (VaR) at the 95% level over one year is correct?
95% VaR is the loss level exceeded with only 5% probability, the 95th percentile of losses. It is not the maximum loss, not the expected loss beyond that point (which is tail VaR), not equal to the standard deviation, and it is not coherent generally since it can fail subadditivity.
- AIt is the expected loss given that the loss exceeds the 95th percentile
- BIt is the loss level that is exceeded with probability 5%Correct
- CIt is the maximum possible loss over the year
- DIt is a coherent risk measure for all distributions
- It equals the standard deviation of losses
Explanation
95% VaR is the 95th percentile of the loss distribution, so losses exceed it with probability 5%. Option A describes tail VaR (expected shortfall). VaR is not the maximum loss and is not coherent in general because it can fail subadditivity.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Measures of investment risk shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Measures of investment risk questions
- For an investor with utility U(w) = -e^{-0.02w}, what is the coefficient of absolute risk aversion A(w) = -U''(w)/U'(w)?
- A portfolio's one-year loss has the following discrete distribution (Rs crore): loss 0 with probability 0.90, loss 10 with probability 0.06,…
- A portfolio has annual return outcomes of -10%, 0%, 10% and 20%, each with probability 0.25. Semi-variance is measured below a target of 0% …
- A fund's annual return is normally distributed with mean 9% and standard deviation 12%. What is the probability that the return is below 0%?…
- Which statement about coherent risk measures is correct?
- Which statement about VaR and Tail VaR as risk measures is correct?