Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Risk Mitigation

Which testing approach best demonstrates that a firm can actually remain within its impact tolerances for an important business service during a severe but plausible disruption?

End-to-end scenario testing of the whole service, including third-party dependencies, with findings fed into remediation, best demonstrates ability to stay within impact tolerances. Policy reviews, isolated component tests and vendor self-certification do not show that the complete service can be recovered within the required limits.

  1. AReviewing the business continuity policy document annually
  2. BEnd-to-end scenario testing of the service, including third-party dependencies, with lessons fed back into remediationCorrect
  3. CTesting only the backup of individual databases in isolation
  4. DRelying on the vendor's certification of its own continuity arrangements

Explanation

Resilience is a service-level outcome, so end-to-end scenario tests that include people, processes, technology and third parties show whether tolerances can be met, and findings drive remediation. Document reviews, isolated component tests and vendor assertions do not prove the full service can be recovered in time.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Risk Mitigation shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Risk Mitigation questions