Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Risk Mitigation

After a breach investigation, a bank finds that an attacker used stolen credentials of a vendor to move laterally from a low-sensitivity reporting server to the core customer database. Which mitigation would most directly limit the impact of a similar intrusion in future, assuming credentials may still be stolen?

Network segmentation with least-privilege access and multi-factor authentication for vendor accounts is best. It assumes credentials can be stolen and limits what they can reach, blocking lateral movement to the core database. Password rotation, insurance and longer log retention do not constrain the attacker's movement.

  1. ANetwork segmentation combined with least-privilege access and multi-factor authentication for vendor accountsCorrect
  2. BIncreasing the password rotation frequency to every 7 days for all staff
  3. CPurchasing additional cyber insurance cover to raise the policy limit
  4. DExtending the retention period of server logs from 90 to 180 days

Explanation

The failure was lateral movement from a low-value system to a critical one using a trusted credential. Segmentation and least privilege restrict what a compromised account can reach, and MFA makes stolen passwords less useful. Frequent rotation is weak against active theft, insurance transfers rather than reduces impact, and longer logs help detection and forensics only after the event.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Risk Mitigation shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Risk Mitigation questions