CS Professional · Drafting, Pleadings and Appearances · Applications, Petitions and Appeals under Companies Act, 2013
While drafting a note on Section 303 for a client, a company secretary lists its two core effects. Which pair is correct?
The two effects are that the order's operation and enforcement remain unaffected by the new Chapter, and that any appeal is filed before the authority competent to hear such appeals before commencement. The section neither cancels the order nor moves appeals to the new Tribunal.
- AIt preserves operation and enforcement of the order, and directs appeals to the authority competent before commencementCorrect
- BIt cancels the order, and directs appeals to the Tribunal
- CIt suspends enforcement, and directs appeals to the Registrar
- DIt preserves the order, and allows appeal before any bench of the NCLT
Explanation
The section has two limbs: the Chapter does not affect operation or enforcement of the pre-commencement winding-up order, and appeals are filed before the authority competent before commencement.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Applications, Petitions and Appeals under Companies Act, 2013 shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Applications, Petitions and Appeals under Companies Act, 2013 questions
- Mr Raghavan, a retired Judge of the Supreme Court, is proposed as Chairperson of the Appellate Tribunal, and Mr Iyer, who has been a Judicia…
- In drafting the memorandum of appeal against a pre-commencement winding-up order, which approach correctly reflects Section 303?
- Bharat Steels Ltd. lost before the NCLAT. Its board wants to appeal to the Supreme Court contending that the NCLAT wrongly appreciated the f…
- Orion Pharma Ltd petitions the NCLT for an approval. The Tribunal grants it but imposes conditions. Later, Orion breaches one condition. Whi…
- Meera, a minority shareholder of Sagar Foods Ltd., was not a party before the NCLAT, but an NCLAT order directly and adversely affected her …
- A High Court passed a winding-up order against Kalyani Textiles Ltd on a date before the Companies Act, 2013 came into force. The Act now ap…