CS Professional · Drafting, Pleadings and Appearances · Applications, Petitions and Appeals under Companies Act, 2013
While drafting an application to the Central Government under the Companies Act, 2013, the draftsman of Narmada Pharma Ltd wishes to state the legal basis for the fee payable. Which statement can be correctly stated in the application?
The application should state that it is accompanied by such fees as may be prescribed. Section 459(2) applies to applications to both the Central Government and the Tribunal, unless the Act provides otherwise, so fees are neither self-determined nor limited to Tribunal filings.
- AThe fee is whatever the applicant considers reasonable
- BThe fee is fixed by the Tribunal in each case at the hearing
- CThe application is accompanied by such fees as may be prescribed, save as otherwise provided in the ActCorrect
- DFees are prescribed only for applications made to the Tribunal, not to the Central Government
Explanation
Section 459(2) applies to applications made to the Central Government or the Tribunal, and requires them to be accompanied by prescribed fees save as otherwise provided. So fees are not self-assessed, not fixed at hearing, and not limited to the Tribunal.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Applications, Petitions and Appeals under Companies Act, 2013 shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Applications, Petitions and Appeals under Companies Act, 2013 questions
- Under Section 459(2), an application made to the Tribunal under a provision of the Act for any approval, direction, exemption or other matte…
- Kaveri Steels Ltd was ordered to be wound up by a Court before the Companies Act, 2013 commenced. A creditor now wants to challenge that ord…
- Kaveri Agro Ltd is preparing an application to the NCLT seeking a direction under a provision of the Companies Act, 2013. The draft is compl…
- Ashoka Textiles Ltd received on 1 March a copy of an order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) that went against it. The …
- A Company Secretary is advising Pragati Steels Ltd. A Court's winding-up order dated shortly before the 2013 Act commenced is to be challeng…
- Sahyadri Textiles Ltd applies to the Tribunal for confirmation of a matter under a provision of the Companies Act, 2013 that is silent on co…