NISM Certifications · NISM-Series-V-A: Mutual Fund Distributors · Mutual Fund Scheme Performance
Why is a scheme's return generally compared with its benchmark, such as a Total Return Index, rather than a price-only index?
A Total Return Index is used because it includes dividends reinvested, just as a scheme's NAV reflects income earned by the portfolio. A price-only index ignores dividends, so it would understate the benchmark and give an unfair comparison with the scheme.
- AA Total Return Index includes reinvested dividends, so it is comparable with scheme returns that include payoutsCorrect
- BA Total Return Index excludes dividends, so it is more conservative
- CA price index is not permitted to be used by any scheme
- DA Total Return Index excludes all taxes and expenses of the index constituents, which is unrelated to the scheme
Explanation
A scheme's NAV return reflects dividends received by the portfolio, so the fair comparison is with an index that also reflects dividends reinvested. A Total Return Index does this; a price index ignores dividends and understates the benchmark's performance.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Mutual Fund Scheme Performance shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Mutual Fund Scheme Performance questions
- A scheme's NAV grew from Rs 25.00 to Rs 36.00 over exactly 2 years, with no dividends. What is the compounded annual growth rate (CAGR)?
- In the context of evaluating a mutual fund scheme, which benchmark choice is most appropriate for a large-cap equity scheme?
- An investor put Rs 1,00,000 in a scheme and the value grew to Rs 1,44,000 after exactly 2 years with no interim cash flows. What is the comp…
- A scheme earned a return of 14% in a year, its benchmark returned 11%, the risk-free rate was 6%, and the scheme's standard deviation was 10…
- Which statement about comparing a mutual fund scheme's performance with its benchmark is most appropriate?
- A scheme's returns over 3 years are 10%, 20% and -10% in successive years. What is the cumulative return over the three years?